Who Is Barack Hussein Obama II - Really?

By Jonathan D. Payne 
Follow Jonathan On Facebook
The American Christian Journal


We are beginning to witness firsthand the unraveling of this Obama presidency - and rather publicly as well. We as Americans have always felt the corruption, not quite detailed and in plain sight, but sensed, now we are seeing it defined before our eyes.

We can no longer say it doesn't smell rancid and putrified, but where is the odor coming from? I have stated before that Obama is not a Democrat or an Independent, or any other readily available moniker et al. What he is is defined under is the broad term is "Progressive". But is that all there is to know?

I have now begun to wonder is he an Islamic Terrorist, who has been positioned to bring about the downfall of the America we used to know and love? So here I want us to look at a few things, put in perspective, and under the guise of fact and not the constantly evolving storyline we are constantly being spoonfed. Let's start with the non-disclosure of many things that other presidents have been vetted for:

• No valid birth certificate (the one given has been declared by experts as false)
• No school records for college (and some indications that he was given a grant as a foreign student)
• False Social Security records
• Family that claims he was born in Kenya
• His father IS Kenyan and his mother can not convey citizenship especially at her birth giving age

But even further it is the notable supposed "gaffs" that give even a clearer message, and one that is very insidious indeed. These are known and truthful facts - not pointless or undefined speculations:

• His nomination (and that of Hillary as well) did not have the necessary signatures to place them on the national ballot for a run for the presidency 
• The men who were supposed to tally the count for the aforementioned ballot are now in Federal Prison for the falsification that got him into the White House
• There were declarations of falsified votes BOTH times
• Voting Poll managers declared many had voted several times for Obama, inclusive of themselves and were proud of this illegal behavior
• That factual voting were "close results" in states where fraud was declared rampant and proveable
• The three (so far) scandals of the IRS, DOJ and Bengazhi, which we are now beginning to see, were formulated by the White House directly and with forthought
• The outright lies, that were manufactured, were done so with the intent to retake the White House for a second term
• The favored positions, money, military jets and weaponry were given directly to our enemies
• The cancellation of White House tours but the favored guests (again) of our enemies were common
• And much, much more....

And we know, as in it has been validated, that Obama's money and influence was a direct result of financier George Soros. This man can not enter some countries because he would be arrested for criminal manipulation of a country's financial base, illegal manipulation of stock markets, and the devaluation of sovereign currencies. He even sold information about fellow Israel  citizens in WWII - for money and profit.

So we see the apple has not fallen far from the tree.

The question is not IF Mr. Obama is corrupt and destroying the very fabric of our country, but rather should we still call him commander-in-chief, or rather terrorist-at-large. We'll see how this all unravels in the coming days, weeks or months ahead. But we already have enough evidence to be assured there is no unplanned moves being contemplated by the powers that be - however temporary they may ultimately be allowed to exert their influence.

God bless America